Tracing JITs for Dynamic Languages

:: HOPL

By: Ming-Ho Yee

Traditional JIT (just-in-time) compilers are method-based: they compile “hot” (i.e. frequently executed) methods to native code. An alternative is trace-based or tracing JITs, where the compilation unit is a (hot) sequence of instructions. Typically, such sequences of instructions correspond to loops, where programs spend most of their execution time.

Where did the idea of tracing come from? What was appealing about it? How was tracing adapted for JITs and dynamic languages? What happened to Mozilla’s TraceMonkey, which used to be part of Firefox? Do any JITs today use tracing?

In this talk, I trace tracing JITs from their origins to some of their recent developments. I cover five papers: the original tracing paper, an implementation of a tracing JIT for Java, the TraceMonkey JIT for JavaScript, PyPy’s “meta-level” tracing, and a specific class of optimizations for tracing JITs.

(The idea of using the phrase “trace tracing JITs” is from Matthias Felleisen.)

All materials can be found in the course repository:


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in on-stack replacement.