François-René Rideau Alacris http://fare.tunes.org
30 January, 2019 10:00AM WVH 366
Software tools imply a story. New stories can help invent new tools. Explicit stories are a great meta-tool... and provide a systematic way to improve the design of programming language design. To illustrate my point, I will present a series of pairs of stories, each time approaching a same topic with very different consequences. Many of my stories will be familiar to most of you, some other stories less so. Hopefully they will be enlightening as well as entertaining... and so will the meta-story be. (Earlier versions of this talk were given at International Lisp Conference 2009, Lisp NYC 2014-10, and more recently LambdaConf 2017.)
François-René Rideau is Co-Founder and Chief Architect at Alacris.io,a company developing a "Blockchain Layer 2 Operating System" using formal methods. Once founder of the TUNES Project, he left academic research on Programming Languages and Distributed Systems to build industrial software at ITA Software, then Google and Bridgewater Associates, before he finally became his own Entrepreneur. Long-standing member of the Lisp community, he runs the Boston Lisp Meeting and still co-maintains ASDF (the Common Lisp build system),though he recently jumped ship to Gerbil Scheme, and now uses OCaml at work.
Christoper Lemmer Webber ActivityPub https://dustycloud.org/
5 December, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366 | Notes
Goblins is an actor model implementation for Racket, inspired by object-capability secure distributed progamming languages such as E with a few new twists of its own thrown in. Goblins is the foundation for a project to build secure, player/user-programmable virtual worlds named Spritely. Spritely builds on the success of the ideas from the ActivityPub protocol, which has succeeded at connecting together various distributed social network projects, extending them to pull in rich interactive and game aspects. See what is built so far, what's coming next, and how the actor model and object capabilities tie together all these ideas to enable a robust and secure distributed system.
Christopher Lemmer Webber is a user freedom advocate who works on distributed social network technology. They are most well known for their work on the W3C ActivityPub federated protocol, which connects over 1.5 million users across the distributed social web. Chris enjoys programming in lisp/scheme flavored languages, especially Racket.
Vitaly Bragilevsky Southern Federal University http://sfedu.ru/www/stat_pages22.show?p=RR/per_eng/D¶ms=(p_per_id=%3E2733)
28 November, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
Programming languages differ a lot in the ways of their development. Who is responsible for including new features and removing obsolete ones? What is a process of doing that? Is there any more or less formal language definition? How respected is that definition by the compilers? How is this changed if there is only one compiler? These questions are answered quite differently for various programming languages. Haskell takes its own way which was crystallized relatively recently. We have GHC Proposals in the form of the GitHub pull requests to suggest new language features. We also have the GHC Steering Committee with its own process to either accept or reject proposals. Finally, there is the Haskell 2020 Language (Haskell Prime) Committee with its own problem of being effectively dead. In this talk, I’d like to describe how this system works for Haskell and why it doesn’t work sometimes. I will discuss the most recent examples of transforming Haskell kinds system towards dependent types (started before the GHC Steering Committee was formed) and introducing linear types in Haskell (subject to the full-blown Committee discussion) among others. I will also characterize the current state and perspectives of the Haskell standardization process.
Vitaly Bragilevsky serves as both the Haskell 2020 Language Committee and the GHC Steering Committee member. He works as a Senior Lecturer at the Southern Federal University in Rostov-on-Don, Russia where he teaches undergraduate students functional programming and theory of computations. He is currently a grantee of the Fulbright Faculty Development Program holding temporary Courtesy Research Assistant position at the University of Oregon under the supervision of Prof. Zena Ariola. Vitaly Bragilevsky translated into Russian and edited translations of the several books on Haskell and the theory of programming languages. He is the author of ‘Haskell in Depth’ (Manning Publications, available via Manning’s early access program).
George T. Heineman Worcester Polytechnic Institute https://www.wpi.edu/people/faculty/heineman
17 October, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
The Expression Problem (EP) describes a common software issue that appears regardless of programming language or programming paradigm. As coined by Philip Wadler in 1998, EP is a new name for an old problem. Given a data type defined by cases, consider two independent extensions, namely, adding new cases to the data type and new functions over the datatype. Dozens of papers in the research literature present their solutions to the EP, using a variety of programming languages and approaches. In this talk I present a Scala-based framework that can synthesize full solutions to the EP problem. The first step is to model the domain of interest (such as mathematical expressions or geometric shapes) to ensure that our synthesized code can work with any desired application domain. Second, we demonstrate how to synthesize code that reproduces a dozen EP solutions from the literature, in C++, Java and Haskell. We designed a common API for all approaches, independent of programming language. While we do not introduce any new approach for EP, we explore the challenges that EP solutions face with binary methods and producer methods. An important contribution of this work is the scientific reproduction of known solutions from the literature. This work is based on an ongoing collaboration with with Jan Bessai (TU Dortmund) and Boris Düdder (Univ. Copenhagen).
George T. Heineman is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at WPI. His research interests are in Software Engineering, specifically synthesizing software systems from composable units. He is co-author of "Algorithms in a Nutshell (2ed)," published by O'Reilly Media in 2016. Aside from his professional pursuits, George is an avid puzzler. He invented Sujiken(R), a Sudoku variation played on a right-triangle arrangement of cells in which numbers cannot repeat in a horizontal row, vertical column or diagonal in any direction.
Michael Greenberg Pomona College http://www.cs.pomona.edu/~michael/
10 October, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
We build intricate systems with complex algorithms and invariants, aiming for guarantees of correctness and performance... and then we maintain and deploy these systems with shell scripts! What *are* shell scripts? If the POSIX shell is a programming language, what are its syntax and semantics? Can we apply PL tools to reason about the shell? Why haven't prior PL attempts at understanding the shell redeemed it?
Cristina Cifuentes Oracle Labs https://labs.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=labs:bio:0:21
3 October, 2018 1:15PM WVF 010
The Parfait static code analysis tool focuses on detecting vulnerabilities that matter in C, C++, Java and PL/SQL languages. Its focus has been on key items expected out of a commercial tool that lives in a commercial organization, namely, precision of results (i.e., high true positive rate), scalability (i.e., being able to run quickly over millions of lines of code), incremental analysis (i.e., being able to run over deltas of the code quickly), and usability (i.e., ease of integration into standard build processes, reporting of traces to the vulnerable location, etc). Today, Parfait is used by thousands of developers at Oracle worldwide on a day-to-day basis. In this presentation we’ll sample a flavour of Parfait — we explore some real world challenges faced in the creation of a robust vulnerability detection tool, look into two examples of vulnerabilities that severely affected the Java platform in 2012/2013 and most machines in 2017/2018, and conclude by recounting what matters to developers for integration into today’s continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines.
Cristina is the Director of Oracle Labs Australia and an Architect at Oracle. Headquartered in Brisbane, the Lab focuses on Program Analysis as it applies to finding vulnerabilities in software and enhancing the productivity of developers worldwide. Prior to founding Oracle Labs Australia, Cristina was the Principal Investigator of the Parfait bug tracking project at Sun Microsystems, then Oracle.
Ohad Kammar University of Oxford https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/ohad.kammar/main.html
3 October, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
Computational effects, such as mutable state, memory allocation, non-determinism, and I/O interaction, allow programs to implicitly exhibit complex behaviour. I will discuss three abstractions that allow programmers to extend a language with user-defined effects. Control operators (call-cc, shift/reset, etc.) are a well-established abstraction for user-defined effects, and I will consider the specific shift/dollar without answer-type-modification. Since the 90s, functional languages have used monads for user-defined effects, and I will consider Filinski's monadic reflection. In the last decade, the community started looking into Plotkin and Pretnar's handlers for algebraic effects (extensible effects in Haskell, OCaml multicore, the Eff, Frank, Koka, and Links programming languages) as a programming abstraction, and I will consider deep handlers without forwarding. I will compare the relative expressive power of these three abstractions using Felleisen's notion of macro-translations. This comparison demonstrates the sensitivity of relative expressiveness of user-defined effects to seemingly orthogonal language features. This talk is based on the paper: On the expressive power of user-defined effects: effect handlers,monadic reflection, delimited control. Yannick Forster, Ohad Kammar, Sam Lindley, and Matija Pretnar. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming, PACMPL 1(ICFP): 13:1-13:29 (2017),arXiv:1610.09161, DOI: 10.1145/3110257.
Ohad Kammar is a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Oxford Department of Computer Science, a Career Development Fellow at Balliol College Oxford, and an incoming Royal Society University Research Fellow at the University of Edinburgh School of Informatics. His fields of interests include programming language modelling and design, logic, and the foundations of computer science.
Mathias Pedersen Aarhus University http://cs.au.dk/~mvp/
19 September, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
We study information flows arising from timing channels in the presence of automatic memory management. We construct a series of example attacks that illustrate how garbage collectors form a shared resource that can be used to reliably leak sensitive information at a rate of up to 1 byte/sec on a contemporary general-purpose computer. The created channel is also observable across a network connection in a datacenter-like setting. We subsequently present a design of an automatic memory management system and prove that the presented attacks are impossible on garbage collectors satisfying this design. The guarantees provided by the language has been mechanized in the Coq proof assistant.
Mathias is a third year PhD student in the Logic and Semantics group at Aarhus University in Denmark, advised by Aslan Askarov. His work is in the area of language-based security, with a focus on provable mitigation of side channels. In general, anything related to compilers and the semantics of programming languages will be on his list of interests.
Justin Pombrio Brown University http://justinpombrio.net
7 August, 2018 11:30AM WVH 366
Type systems and syntactic sugar are both valuable to programmers, but sometimes at odds. While sugar is a valuable mechanism for implementing realistic languages, the expansion process obscures program source structure. As a result, type errors can reference terms the programmers did not write (and even constructs they do not know), baffling them. The language developer must also manually construct type rules for the sugars, to give a typed account of the surface language. We address these problems by presenting a process for automatically reconstructing type rules for the surface language using rules for the core. We have implemented this theory, and show several interesting case studies.
Justin Pombrio is a recent PhD graduate from Brown University. His research is mainly in programming languages, with a focus on syntactic sugar, but also includes CS education.
Francesco Zappa Nardelli Inria Paris – Rocquencourt http://www.di.ens.fr/~zappa/
15 June, 2018 10:00AM WVH 366
The spectacular results achieved by computer science in the recent years rely on hidden, obscure, and badly specified components that lurk at the very heart of our computing infrastructure. Consider DWARF debug information. Debug information is relied upon by debuggers and plays a key role in the in the implementation of program analysis tools. More surprisingly, debug information can be relied upon by the runtime of high-level programming languages, for instance by C++ to unwind the stack and implement exceptions. The debug information itself can be pervaded by subtle bugs, making the whole infrastructure unreliable. In this talk I will describe techniques and tools to perform validation and synthesis of the DWARF stack unwinding tables. I will also report on adventurous projects that we might build on top of reliable DWARF information.
Francesco Zappa Nardelli is a Researcher at Inria Paris – Rocquencourt. His research interests focus on concurrent computation on top of relaxed memory models, ranging from hardware models of modern architectures to high-level programming language specification and compilation. He received his Ph.D. from Université Paris 7 in 2003. Since then, he has worked on language design for distributed computation, type systems for integrating typed and untyped code in scripting languages, and tool support for semantics (including the Ott tool).
Max New Northeastern University http://maxsnew.github.io/
27 April, 2018 11:30AM WVH 366
I will present Call-by-name (CBN) Gradual Type Theory , an axiomatic semantics of CBN gradual typing that directly axiomatizes the extensionality (eta) principles of types and the "gradual guarantee" of . By axiomatizing the "term precision" relation of  we can provide a specification for casts as meets and joins with respect to precision. Using our type theory, we then show that the classic function contract () is in fact the unique implementation of function casts that satisfies extensionality and the gradual guarantee. This shows that the combination of these properties is a very strong constraint on the design of a gradually typed language and any implementation that departs must sacrifice one of these properties (typically extensionality).
 Call-by-Name Gradual Type Theory, New and Licata, to appear FSCD '18,https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00061
 Refined Criteria for Gradual Typing, Siek, Vitousek, Cimini and Boyland, SNAPL '15, http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2015/5031/
 Contracts for Higher-Order Functions, Findler and Felleisen, ICFP '02,https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=581484
Max New is a PhD student at Northeastern University working on the semantic foundations of programming languages. He hates proving the same theorem twice and you should too.
John Tristan Oracle Labs https://jtristan.github.io/
10 April, 2018 11:45AM WVH 366
One of the several interesting challenges of probabilistic programming is that of compiling probabilistic programs to inference algorithms. One of these inference algorithms, Gibbs sampling, is particularly relevant because it is often statistically efficient, but unfortunately, it is difficult to derive and therefore compile to.
In this talk, after a brief explanation of probabilistic programming and why its relevance to data science, I will explain some of the ideas behind the design of a compiler from (very) simple probabilistic programs to Gibbs sampling. I will also attempt to explain what it would mean for such a compiler to be correct.
Jean-Baptiste Tristan is a researcher in the machine learning group at Oracle Labs. He holds a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) and a M.Sc. in Computer Science from the Ecole Normale Superieure of Paris.
Andrei Alexandrescu D Language Foundation http://erdani.com
6 February, 2018 11:45AM WVH 366
Years ago, D started modestly as an improved offering in the realm of systems programming languages, sharing a good deal of philosophy with C and C++. With time, however, D became a very distinct language with unique features (and, of course, its own mistakes).
One angle of particular interest has been D's ability to perform compile-time introspection. Artifacts in a D program can be "looked at" during compilation. Coupled with a full-featured compile-time evaluation engine and with an ability to generate arbitrary code during compilation, this has led to a number of interesting applications.
This talk shares early experience with using these features of the D language. Design by Introspection is a proposed programming paradigm that assembles designs by performing introspection on components during compilation.
Andrei Alexandrescu is a researcher, software engineer, and author. He wrote three best-selling books on programming (Modern C++ Design, C++ Coding Standards, and The D Programming Language) and numerous articles and papers on wide-ranging topics from programming to language design to Machine Learning to Natural Language Processing. Andrei holds a PhD in Computer Science from the University of Washington and a BSc in Electrical Engineering from University "Politehnica" Bucharest. He currently works on the D Language Foundation. http://erdani.com
I will summarize our work on a declarative programming language that offers native language support for model (or instance) finding. This capability can be used to express predictive (e.g. machine learning) and prescriptive (e.g. combinatorial optimization) analytics. The presentation gives an overview of the platform and the language. In particular, it focuses on the important role of integrity constraints,which are used not only for maintaining data integrity, but also, for the formal specification of complex optimization problems and probabilistic programming.
Mr. Molham Aref is the Chief Executive Officer of Relational AI. Mr. Aref has more than 25 years of experience in developing and implementing enterprise-grade analytic, predictive, optimization and simulation solutions for the demand chain, supply chain, and revenue management across various industries. Relational AI combines the latest advances in Artificial Intelligence with a understanding of business processes to develop solutions that shape better decisions, improve agility, and reduce risk. Prior to Relational AI, he was co-founder and CEO of LogicBlox where he led the company from inception through a successful sale to Infor. Previously, he was CEO of Optimi (acquired by Ericsson),a leader in wireless network simulation and optimization, and co-founder of Brickstream (renamed Nomi and then acquired by FLIR), a leading provider of computer-vision-based behavior intelligence solutions.
Chris Martens North Carolina State University https://sites.google.com/ncsu.edu/cmartens
11 December, 2017 11:00AM WVH 366
Creativity is seen as a core cognitive ability for tasks like storytelling, conversation, and aesthetic design. Simulating creative processes with computers enables them to amplify humans' natural creativity and to support applications like interactive narrative, chatbots, and procedural level generators for games. By now, a large number of techniques exist for simulating creativity, such as search, planning, production grammars, logic programming, stochastic modeling from data, and hybrid approaches. However, even the simplest methods are commonly considered programming tasks for "AI experts." High-level programming languages have the potential to broaden participation in authorship of these systems, but only if they are designed with compositionality -- the mathematical principle that's also functional programming's secret weapon -- in mind. This talk will discuss what compositionality has achieved so far for creative computing and what we can do with it next.
Chris Martens is an assistant professor in the Computer Science (CSC) Department at NC State, where she is affiliated with the Digital Games research group. Her interests span artificial intelligence, programming languages, and formal methods.
Fabian Muehlboeck Cornell University http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~fabianm/
5 December, 2017 2:00PM WVH 366
Gradual Typing is the idea that we can support both static and dynamic type checking in different parts of the same program in the same language. Most existing work on gradual typing aims to add gradual typing to an existing language. However, this severely constrains some key decisions in creating gradually typed languages, often leading designers to trade off either soundness or efficiency.
I will talk about designing a nominal object-oriented language with gradual typing as a core component from the start. This affects key design decisions for the other type system features, as well as the design of the runtime. Experiments with a prototype language I implemented suggest that this is a viable approach to achieve sound, yet efficient gradual typing. I will present those results and talk about some key design challenges that have yet to be solved.
Fabian Muehlboeck is a Ph.D. student working with Ross Tate at Cornell University.
Jeffrey M. Siskind Purdue University https://engineering.purdue.edu/~qobi/
11 September, 2017 1:30PM WVH 366
Deep learning is formulated around backpropagation, a method for computing gradients of a particular class of data flow graphs to train models to minimize error by gradient descent. Backpropagation is a special case of a more general method known as reverse mode automatic differentiation (AD) for computing gradients of functions expressed as programs. Reverse mode AD imposes only a small constant-factor overhead in operation count over the original computation, but has storage requirements that grow, in the worst case, in proportion to the time consumed by the original computation. This storage blowup can be ameliorated by check pointing, a process that reorders application of classical reverse-mode AD over an execution interval to tradeoff space vs. time. Application of check pointing in a divide-and-conquer fashion to strategically chosen nested execution intervals can break classical reverse-mode AD into stages which can reduce the worst-case growth in storage from linear to logarithmic. Doing this has been fully automated only for computations of particularly simple form, with checkpoints spanning execution intervals resulting from a limited set of program constructs. We show how the technique can be automated for arbitrary computations. Doing so relies on implementing general purpose mechanisms for counting the number of instructions executed by a program, interrupting the execution after a specified number of steps, and resuming the execution with a nonstandard interpretation. We implement these general purpose mechanisms with a compiler that converts programs to continuation-passing style (CPS). The process of efficiently computing gradients with check pointing requires running, and rerunning, little bits of the program out of order. This is made easier by applying the technique to functional programs. There is a deeper and higher-level message in this talk: machine learning can benefit from advanced techniques from programming language theory.
Jeffrey M. Siskind received the B.A. degree in Computer Science from the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, in 1979, the S.M. degree in Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), Cambridge, in 1989, and the Ph.D. degree in Computer Science from M.I.T. in 1992. He did a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science from 1992 to 1993. He was an assistant professor at the University of Toronto Department of Computer Science from 1993 to 1995, a senior lecturer at the Technion Department of Electrical Engineering in 1996, a visiting assistant professor at the University of Vermont Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from 1996 to 1997, and a research scientist at NEC Research Institute, Inc. from 1997 to 2001. He joined the Purdue University School of Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2002 where he is currently an associate professor. His research interests include computer vision, robotics, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, cognitive science, computational linguistics, child language acquisition, automatic differentiation, and programming languages and compilers.
Dustin Jamner Northeastern University https://github.com/DIJamner
23 June, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
The polymorphic blame calculus integrates static typing, including universal types, with dynamic typing. The primary challenge with this integration is preserving parametricity: even dynamically-typed code should satisfy it once it has been cast to a universal type. Ahmed et al. (2011) employ runtime type generation in the polymorphic blame calculus to preserve parametricity, but a proof that it does so has been elusive. Matthews and Ahmed (2008) gave a proof of parametricity for a closely related system that combines ML and Scheme, but later found a flaw in their proof. In this work we prove that the polymorphic blame calculus satisfies relational parametricity. The proof relies on a step-indexed Kripke logical relation. The step-indexing is required to make the logical relation well-defined in the case for the dynamic type. The possible worlds include the mapping of generated type names to their concrete types and the mapping of type names to relations. We prove the Fundamental Property of this logical relation and that it is sound with respect to contextual equivalence.
Dustin Jamner is an undergraduate at Northeastern University in Computer Science, working with Amal Ahmed.
Cesare Tinelli University of Iowa http://homepage.cs.uiowa.edu/~tinelli/
1 June, 2017 11:00AM WVH 366
Contract-based software development is a leading methodology for the construction of safety- and mission-critical embedded systems. Contracts are an effective way to establish boundaries between components and can be used efficiently to verify global properties by using compositional reasoning techniques. A contract specifies the assumptions a component makes on its context and the guarantees it provides. Requirements in the specification of a component are often case-based, with each case describing what the component should do depending on a specific situation (or mode) the component is in.
This talk introduces CoCoSpec, a mode-aware assume-guarantee-based contract language for embedded systems. CoCoSpec is built as an extension of the Lustre language and lets users specify mode behavior directly, instead of encoding it as conditional guarantees, thus preventing a loss of mode-specific information. Mode-aware model checkers supporting CoCoSpec can increase the effectiveness of the compositional analysis techniques found in assume-guarantee frameworks and improve scalability. Such tools can also produce much better feedback during the verification process, as well as valuable qualitative information on the contract itself. I will presents the CoCoSpec language and illustrate the benefits of mode-aware model-checking on a case study involving a flight-critical avionics system. The evaluation uses Kind 2, a collaborative, parallel, SMT-based model checker developed at the University of Iowa that provides full support for CoCoSpec.
Cesare Tinelli received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the UIUC in 1999 and is currently a professor in Computer Science at the University of Iowa. His research interests include automated reasoning and formal methods. He has done seminal work in automated reasoning, in particular in Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT), a field he helped establish through his research and service activities. His work has been funded both by governmental agencies (AFOSR, AFRL, DARPA, NASA, and NSF) and corporations (Intel, General Electric, Rockwell Collins, and United Technologies) and has appeared in more than 70 refereed publications. He is a founder and coordinator of the SMT-LIB initiative, an international effort aimed at standardizing benchmarks and I/O formats for SMT solvers. He has led the development of the award winning Darwin theorem prover and the Kind model checker. He co-leads the development of CVC4,a widely used and award winning SMT solver, and StarExec, a cross community web-based service for the comparative evaluation of logic solvers.
5 May, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Programming language research keeps inventing more powerful dynamic and static features for programming language. Ideally, thorough language design should be able to propose a single, unified, powerful yet simple view of them as orthogonal aspects of a single programming language that would remain usable by everyone. In practice, it always takes much more time and effort to find the simple/orthogonal presentation than to come up with the desirable features, and we become emotionally attached to programming language monoliths (C++, Scala, GHC Haskell, OCaml, Common Lisp...) that suffer from feature creep. An alternative is to design programming systems as multi-language environment instead. This point of view makes it easier to detect flaws in a proposed programming system design: there is no clear objective definition of what "orthogonal features" really mean, but we have clear ideas of how multi-language systems should work. The Racket Manifesto says: "Each language and component must be able to protect its specific invariants".
In this work we give a formal specification, in terms of full abstraction, for what it means for a new language added to the system to not introduce "abstraction leaks" in the other languages, and discuss scenarios where this translates in (informal) usability properties: having a nice teachable language subset, or gracefully introducing an advanced language for experts. We present a multi-language design that exhibits this formal property by adding a language L with linear types and linear state to a typical ML-style programming language U. L allows to write programs with resource usage guarantees (space consumption, typestate-style safety guarantees) that were not possible in U, without introducing abstraction leaks. We will demonstrate several useful examples, some of them that crucially rely on the fine-grained use of language boundaries, at a subterm level rather than whole-module level.
Magnus Madsen University of Waterloo plg.uwaterloo.ca/~mmadsen/
14 April, 2017 1:30PM WVH 366
We present FLIX, a declarative programming language for specifying and solving least fixed point problems, particularly static program analyses. FLIX is inspired by Datalog and extends it with lattices and monotone functions. Using FLIX,implementors of static analyses can express a broader range of analyses than is currently possible in pure Datalog, while retaining its familiar rule-based syntax. We define a model-theoretic semantics of FLIX as a natural extension of the Datalog semantics. This semantics captures the declarative meaning of FLIX programs without imposing any specific evaluation strategy. An efficient strategy is semi-naïve evaluation which we adapt for FLIX. We have implemented a compiler and runtime for FLIX, and used it to express several well-known static analyses, including the IFDS and IDE algorithms. The declarative nature of FLIX clearly exposes the similarity between these two algorithms.
This work has previously been presented at PLDI 2016. The talk will cover some of that material as well as recent developments.
The speaker is a post doctoral fellow at the University of Waterloo.
Mooly Sagiv Tel Aviv University http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~msagiv/
31 March, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Safety of a distributed protocol means that the protocol never reaches a bad state, e.g., a state where two nodes become leaders in a leader-election protocol. Proving safety is obviously undecidable since such protocols are run by an unbounded number of nodes, and their safety needs to be established for any number of nodes. I will describe a deductive approach for proving safety, based on the concept of universally quantified inductive invariants --- an adaptation of the mathematical concept of induction to the domain of programs. In the deductive approach, the programmer specifies a candidate inductive invariant and the system automatically checks if it is inductive. By restricting the invariants to be universally quantified, this approach can be effectively implemented with a SAT solver.
This is a joint work with Ken McMillan (MSR), Oded Padon (TAU), Aurojit Panda(Berkeley) , and Sharon Shoham(TAU) and was integrated into the IVY system: http://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~odedp/ivy/. The work is inspired by Shachar Itzhaky's thesis available from http://people.csail.mit.edu/shachari/
Mooly Sagiv is a professor in the School of Computer Sciences at Tel-Aviv University. He is a leading researcher in the area of large scale (inter-procedural) program analysis, and one of the key contributors to shape analysis. His fields of interests include programming languages, compilers, abstract interpretation, profiling, pointer analysis, shape analysis, inter-procedural dataflow analysis, program slicing, and language-based programming environments. Sagiv is a recipient of a 2013 senior ERC research grant for Verifying and Synthesizing Software Composition. Prof. Sagiv served as Member of the Advisory Board of Panaya Inc acquired by Infosys. He received best-paper awards at PLDI'11 and PLDI'12 for his work on composing concurrent data structures and a ACM SIGSOFT Retrospective Impact Paper Award (2011) for program slicing. He is an ACM fellow and a recipient of Microsoft Research Outstanding Collaborator Award 2016.
Swarat Chaudhuri Rice University https://www.cs.rice.edu/~sc40/
24 March, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Automating programming and debugging are long-standing goals in computer science. In spite of significant progress in formal methods over the years, we remain very far from achieving these goals. For example, a freshman CS major will typically program circles around today's best program synthesizers. Debugging and verification tools rely on formal specifications, which are hard to provide in many important applications.
Two critical components of the gap between human and machine programmers are that humans learn from experience, i.e., data, and can easily generalize from incomplete problem definitions. In this talk, I will present a general framework for formal methods, based on Bayesian statistical learning, that aims to eliminate these differences. In our framework, descriptions of programming tasks are seen to be "clues" towards a hidden (probabilistic) specification that fully defines the task. Large corpora of real-world programs are used to construct a statistical model that correlates specifications with the form and function of their implementations. The framework can be implemented in a variety of ways, but in particular, through a neural architecture called Bayesian variational encoder-decoders. Inferences made using the framework can be used to guide traditional algorithms for program synthesis and bug-finding.
I will show that this data-driven approach can lead to giant leaps in the scope and performance of automated program synthesis and debugging algorithms. Specifically, I will give a demo of Bayou, a system for Bayesian inductive synthesis of Java programs that goes significantly beyond the state of the art in program synthesis. I will also describe Salento, a debugging system based on our framework that can find subtle violations of API contracts without any kind of specification.
Swarat Chaudhuri is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Rice University. His research lies at the interface of programming systems and artificial intelligence. Much of his recent work is on program synthesis, the problem of automatically generating computer programs from high-level specifications.
Jimmy Hartzell Tower Research
10 March, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Like many modern programming languages, C++ supports both generic programming (templates) and object-oriented programming (inheritance and virtual functions). Unlike many modern programming languages, the generic programming mechanism does not fully leverage or interact with the type system. It amounts to compile-time duck typing: C++ function templates, like functions from a non-statically typed programming language, have their full interface implicit in their implementations -- making it hard to discern what that interface actually is. The concept of Concepts (compile-time typeclasses) was slated for introduction into C++ in the C++11 version of the standard, then C++14, then C++17, now C++20... What can we do to work around their absence?
Relatedly, how do we bridge the gap between static and dynamic polymorphism? C++ provides both, and sometimes we want to mix and mash them. Template tricks can also be done to accomplish this as well.
Jimmy Hartzell is a software developer and C++ instructor at Tower Research.
Ben Sherman MIT http://www.ben-sherman.net/
24 February, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366 | Notes
Topology, when viewed from an unusual perspective (formal topology), describes how to compute with certain objects that are beyond the reach of induction, such as real numbers, probability distributions, streams, and function spaces. Accordingly, one gets a programming language whose types are spaces and whose functions are continuous maps.
Does this language have pattern matching? In functional programming, pattern matching allows definition of a function by partitioning the input and defining the result in each case. We generalize to programming with spaces, where patterns need not represent decidable predicates and also may overlap, potentially allowing nondeterministic behavior in overlapping regions. These overlapping pattern matches are useful for writing a wide array of computer programs on spaces, such as programs that make approximate computations or decisions based on continuous values or that manipulate "partial" datatypes.
This talk will introduce topology from a computational perspective, and explore some programs that can be built with this framework using overlapping pattern matching.
Ben Sherman is a second-year PhD student at MIT, advised by Adam Chlipala and Michael Carbin.
Julia Belyakova Northeastern University http://staff.mmcs.sfedu.ru/~juliet/index.en.html
3 February, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Earlier comparative studies of language support for generic programming (GP) have shown that mainstream object-oriented (OO) languages such as C# and Java provide weaker support for GP as compared with functional languages such as Haskell or SML.
One reason is that generic mechanisms of C# and Java are based on F-bounded polymorphism, which has certain deficiencies. Some of these deficiencies are eliminated in more recent languages, such as Scala and Kotlin. However, there are peculiarities of object-oriented languages as a whole, which prevent them from being as expressible as Haskell in terms of generic programming.
In this talk we will cover the main problems of language support for generic programming in C#/Java as well as other modern object-oriented languages, including Scala and Swift. It turns out that all of these languages follow the same approach to constraining type parameters, which leads to inevitable shortcomings. To overcome them, an alternative approach is suggested in several extensions for OO languages, in particular, JavaGenus. The advantages and drawbacks of both approaches will be discussed in the talk.
Here are Julia's Slides.
Julia Belyakova graduated in 2014 from Southern Federal University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) as Master of Science in “Computer Science and Information Technologies”. She is enrolled for PhD program in Southern Federal University and came to Northeastern University as a visiting scientist. She is currently doing research in the area of generic programming for object-oriented languages.
John Vilk University of Massachusetts Amherst https://jvilk.com/
27 January, 2017 12:00PM WVH 366
Billions of people use browsers to access the web from a variety of devices, but it remains difficult to write and debug the client-side of web applications. The browser exposes unfamiliar, redundant, and incompatible abstractions for a variety of common tasks, preventing developers from adapting existing code written for other platforms. The browser environment is completely event-driven and pervasively concurrent, resulting in complex control flow and race conditions that are difficult to debug.
John Vilk is a Ph.D. candidate in the College of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. He is a member of the PLASMA lab, and is advised by Emery Berger. John's research aims to improve the browser as an application platform by making it easier to write, debug, and optimize complex web applications. John is a Facebook Fellow (2015), and his work on Doppio: Breaking the Browser Language Barrier is a SIGPLAN Research Highlight (2014) and a PLDI Distinguished Artifact (2014). His research forms the basis of Microsoft ChakraCore's time-traveling debugger and lets millions of people interact with legacy software and games in their browser at the Internet Archive (https://archive.org/). John received his MS from the University of Massachusetts Amherst (2013) and his BS from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2011).
You can learn more about John at his website, https://jvilk.com/.
Max New Northeastern University http://maxsnew.github.io/
15 December, 2016 12:00PM Behrakis 105 | Notes
It has long been noted that research on contracts and gradual typing bears a striking resemblance to Dana Scott's work on retracts in domain theory. However, a concrete relationship has been elusive, especially since the notion of *blame* has seemingly no counterpart in domain theory.
We connect these fields by means of gradual type precision, which has been characterized previously using blame in . We propose a definition in terms of section-retraction pairs, allowing us to relate blame and retractions in a precise way. Our definition agrees with  on most rules, but differs in a way that suggests a modification to their definition of blame.
 Wadler and Findler, Well-typed Programs can't Be Blamed: http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/topics/blame.html#blame-esop
Max New is a PhD student at Northeastern University working on the semantic foundations of programming languages. He hates proving the same theorem twice and you should too.
Gabriel Scherer Northeastern University http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/gasche/
7 December, 2016 12:00PM WVH 110
The simply-typed λ-calculus, with only function types, is strongly normalizing, and its program equivalence relation is decidable: unlike in more advanced type system with polymorphism or effects, the natural "syntactic" equivalence (βη-equivalence) corresponds to natural "semantic" equivalence (observational or contextual equivalence), and is decidable. Adding product types (pairs) is easy and preserves these properties, but sums (disjoint unions) are, surprisingly, harder. It is only in 1995 that Neil Ghani proved that the equivalence in presence of sums is decidable, and the situation in presence of the empty type (zero-ary sum) was unknown.
We propose an equivalence algorithm for sums and the empty type that takes inspiration from a proof-theoretic technique, named "focusing",designed for proof search. The exposition will be introductory; I will present the difficulties caused by sums and the empty type, present some of the existing approaches for sums in the literature, introduce focusing, and give a high-level intuition of our saturation-based algorithm and its termination argument. No previous knowledge of focusing is assumed. I expect some familiarity with typed lambda-calculi, but will recall all concepts used (for example, βη-equivalence) during the talk.
Gabriel is interested in theoretical aspects of type systems, programming language implementation, general programming language concepts, and even some syntactic aspects. He has a preference for the formalizable aspects, or formalizable approaches to programming language aspects, rather than the often subjective appeal to taste or intuition.
Julian Dolby IBM Research http://researcher.ibm.com/person/us-dolby
1 December, 2016 12:00PM Richards Hall 140
1: Sungho Lee, Julian Dolby, Sukyoung Ryu: HybriDroid: static analysis framework for Android hybrid applications. ASE 2016: 250-261
3: Wei Huang, Yao Dong, Ana Milanova, Julian Dolby: Scalable and precise taint analysis for Android. ISSTA 2015: 106-117
Julian Dolby is a Research Staff Member at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, where he works on a range of topics, including static program analysis, software testing, concurrent programming models and the semantic Web. He is one of the primary authors of the publically available Watson Libraries for Analysis (WALA) program analysis infrastructure, and his recent WALA work has focused on creating the WALA Mobile infrastructure.
Zena Ariola University of Oregon http://ix.cs.uoregon.edu/~ariola/
28 November, 2016 12:00PM WVH 110
We will present and demonstrate the usefulness of the sequent calculus as a formal model of computation based on interactions between producers and consumers of results. This model leads to a better understanding of call-by-name evaluation by reconciling the conflicting principles of extensionality and weak-head evaluation, thus internalizing a known parametricity result. It allows one to explore two dualities of computation: the duality between call-by-name and call-by-value, and the duality between construction and deconstruction. This ultimately leads to a better linguistic foundation for co-induction as dual to induction. From a more practical point of view, the sequent calculus provides a useful inspiration for the design of intermediate languages.
Ryan Culpepper Northeastern University http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ryanc/
3 November, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
In this talk I introduce a probabilistic programming language with continuous random variables and soft constraints, define contextual equivalence for the language, and then present a logical relation that is sound with respect to contextual equivalence.
The question of equivalence for probabilistic programs is interesting and difficult because the meaning of a program is a measure defined by integrating over the space of all of the program's possible evaluations. Thus creating a workable logical relation requires proving integral equalities involving intermediate measures that are ``equal enough'' but still respect contextual equivalence.
Ryan Culpepper is a research scientist at Northeastern University. He works on probabilistic programming as well as extensible languages and tools for building domain-specific languages. He received his PhD at Northeastern and did a postdoc at the University of Utah.
Christopher Meiklejohn Université Catholique de Louvain https://christophermeiklejohn.com/
27 October, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
Consistency is hard and coordination is expensive. As we move into the world of connected 'Internet of Things' style applications, or large-scale mobile applications, devices have less power, periods of limited connectivity, and operate over unreliable asynchronous networks. This poses a problem with shared state: how do we handle concurrent operations over shared state, while clients are offline, and ensure that values converge to a desirable result without making the system unavailable?
We look at a new programming model, called Lasp. This programming model combines distributed convergent data structures with a dataflow execution model designed for distribution over large-scale applications. This model supports arbitrary placement of processing node: this enables the user to author applications that can be distributed across data centers and pushed to the edge.
Christopher Meiklejohn loves distributed systems and programming languages. Previously, Christopher worked at Basho Technologies, Inc. on the distributed key-value store, Riak. Christopher develops a programming model for distributed computation, called Lasp. Christopher is currently a Ph.D. student at the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium.
Julien Verlaguet & Brett Simmers Facebook http://hacklang.org/
25 October, 2016 1:30PM WVH 366
The Hack programming language developed at Facebook is an evolution of PHP. With tens of millions of lines of PHP code in house, the lack of type and poor IDE support were felt to be major threats to Facebook. We designed Hack gradually, adding feature at regular intervals and encouraging developers to adopt them in their code. This talk will touch on the design of the Hack language, its type system, the implementation of the type checker, and the social processes involved in converting 20 millions lines of untyped code to a rich type system.
HHVM is an open source virtual machine for PHP and Hack programs. It was developed by Facebook but is also used by Wikipedia, Baidu, Etsy, and many others. This talk will discuss the history of the project, what goes on behind the scenes while executing your PHP code, and what we're currently working on.
Julien Verlaguet is a OCaml programmer with a Master from Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris. Before joining Facebook in 2011, he worked at Esterel technologies on verified compilation. At Facebook he designed the Hack programming language, a typed offspring of PHP and managed to convince the majority of developers in the company to add types to their code.
Brett Simmers is a Software Engineer at Facebook, where he's been working on HHVM for the past five years. He primarily works on the internals of the JIT compiler and HHVM's profile-guided optimizations. Before joining Facebook he spent two years at VMware working on the Linux version of VMware Workstation.
Ming-Ho Yee Northeastern University http://mhyee.com
20 October, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
Static program analysis is a powerful technique for maintaining software, with applications such as compiler optimizations, code refactoring, and bug finding. Static analyzers are typically implemented in general-purpose programming languages, such as C++ and Java; however, these analyzers are complex and often difficult to understand and maintain. An alternate approach is to use Datalog, a declarative language. Implementors can express analysis constraints declaratively, which makes it easier to understand and ensure correctness of the analysis. Furthermore, the declarative nature of the analysis allows multiple, independent analyses to be easily combined.
Flix is a programming language for static analysis, consisting of a logic language and a functional language. The logic language is inspired by Datalog, but supports user-defined lattices. The functional language allows implementors to write functions, something which is not supported in Datalog. These two extensions, user-defined lattices and functions, allow Flix to support analyses that cannot be expressed by Datalog, such as a constant propagation analysis. Datalog is limited to constraints on relations, and although it can simulate finite lattices, it cannot express lattices over an infinite domain. Finally, another advantage of Flix is that it supports interoperability with existing tools written in general-purpose programming languages.
This talk provides an overview of the implementation and evaluation of the Flix functional language. The implementation involves abstract syntax tree transformations, an interpreter back-end, and a code generator back-end, and must support a number of interesting language features, such as pattern matching, first-class functions, and interoperability. The evaluation compares the interpreter and code generator back-ends in terms of correctness and performance.
Ming-Ho Yee is a Ph.D. student at Northeastern University. He works on programming language design and implementation with Jan Vitek. He received a Bachelor of Software Engineering from the University of Waterloo, and then continued for a Master of Mathematics in Computer Science under the supervision of Ondřej Lhoták.
Thomas Wahl Northeastern University http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/wahl/
13 October, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
The precise semantics of floating-point arithmetic programs depends on the execution platform, including the compiler and the target hardware. Such platform dependencies infringe on the highly desirable goal of software portability (which is in fact promised by heterogeneous computing frameworks like OpenCL): the same program run on the same inputs on different platforms can produce different results. In other words, portability does not guarantee reproducibility, and this is a more or less accepted state of affairs.
Serious doubts on the portability of numeric applications arise when differences in results are behavioral, i.e. when they lead to changes in the control flow of a program. In this talk I will first present an algorithm that takes a numeric procedure and determines whether a given input can lead to different decisions depending merely on how the arithmetic in the procedure is compiled and executed. I will then show how this algorithm can be used in static and dynamic analyses of programs, to estimate their numeric stability. I will illustrate the results on examples characteristic of numeric computing where control flow divergence actually occurs across different execution platforms.
Joint with Yijia Gu, Mahsa Bayati, and Miriam Leeser, Northeastern University, Boston, USA
Thomas Wahl joined the faculty of Northeastern University in 2011. His research concerns the reliability (whatever that means) of complex computing systems. Two domains notorious for their fragility are concurrency and numerical computing. With colleagues, Wahl has investigated how floating-point arithmetic can "hijack" a program's computation when run on non-standard architectures, such as heterogeneous and custom-made embedded platforms. You will witness some hijacking attempts in the talk today.
Koushik Sen University of California, Berkeley https://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ksen/
6 October, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
Symbolic execution, which was introduced more than four decades ago, is typically used in software testing to explore as many different program paths as possible in a given amount of time, and for each path to generate a set of concrete input values exercising it, and check for the presence of various kinds of errors including assertion violations, uncaught exceptions, security vulnerabilities, and memory corruption. A key limitation of classical symbolic execution is that it cannot generate useful test inputs if the program under test uses complex operations such as pointer manipulations and non-linear arithmetic operations.
Our research on Concolic Testing (also known as DART: Directed Automated Random Testing or Dynamic Symbolic Execution) alleviated the limitations of classical symbolic execution by combining concrete execution and symbolic execution. We demonstrated that concolic testing is an effective technique for generating high-coverage test suites and for finding deep errors in complex software applications. The success of concolic testing in scalably and exhaustively testing real-world software was a major milestone in the ad hoc world of software testing and has inspired the development of several industrial and academic automated testing and security tools.
Koushik Sen is an associate professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences at the University of California, Berkeley. His research interest lies in Software Engineering, Programming Languages, and Formal methods. He is interested in developing software tools and methodologies that improve programmer productivity and software quality. He is best known for his work on ³DART: Directed Automated Random Testing² and concolic testing. He has received a NSF CAREER Award in 2008, a Haifa Verification Conference (HVC) Award in 2009, a IFIP TC2 Manfred Paul Award for Excellence in Software: Theory and Practice in 2010, a Sloan Foundation Fellowship in 2011, a Professor R. Narasimhan Lecture Award in 2014, and an Okawa Foundation Research Grant in 2015. He has won several ACM SIGSOFT Distinguished Paper Awards. He received the C.L. and Jane W-S. Liu Award in 2004, the C. W. Gear Outstanding Graduate Award in 2005, and the David J. Kuck Outstanding Ph.D. Thesis Award in 2007, and a Distinguished Alumni Educator Award in 2014 from the UIUC Department of Computer Science. He holds a B.Tech from Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, and M.S. and Ph.D. in CS from University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Philipp Haller KTH Royal Institute of Technology http://www.csc.kth.se/~phaller/
29 September, 2016 12:30PM WVH 366
Aliasing is a known source of challenges in the context of imperative object-oriented languages, which have led to important advances in type systems for aliasing control. However, their large-scale adoption has turned out to be a surprisingly difficult challenge. While new language designs show promise, they do not address the need of aliasing control in existing languages.
This paper presents a new approach to isolation and uniqueness in an existing, widely-used language, Scala. The approach is unique in the way it addresses some of the most important obstacles to the adoption of type system extensions for aliasing control. First, adaptation of existing code requires only a minimal set of annotations. Only a single bit of information is required per class. Surprisingly, the paper shows that this information can be provided by the object-capability discipline, widely-used in program security. We formalize our approach as a type system and prove key soundness theorems. The type system is implemented for the full Scala language, providing, for the first time, a sound integration with Scala’s local type inference. Finally, we empirically evaluate the conformity of existing Scala open-source code on a corpus of over 75,000 LOC.
Philipp Haller is an assistant professor in the theoretical computer science group at KTH Royal Institute of Technology, the leading technical university in Sweden. His main research interests are programming languages, type systems, concurrent, and distributed programming. Philipp is co-author of Scala's async/await extension for asynchronous computations, and one of the lead designers of Scala's futures and promises library. As main author of the book "Actors in Scala," he created Scala's first widely-used actors library. Philipp was co-chair of the 2013 and 2014 editions of the Scala Workshop, and co-chair of the 2015 ACM SIGPLAN Scala Symposium. Previously, he has held positions at Typesafe, Stanford University, and EPFL. He received a PhD in computer science from EPFL in 2010.
Jan Vitek Northeastern University http://janvitek.org/
15 September, 2016 12:30PM WVH 366
Julia, like R, is a dynamic language for scientific computing but, unlike R, it was explicitly designed to deliver performance competitive to traditional batch-compiled languages. To achieve this Julia's designers made a number of unusual choices, including the presence of a set of type annotations that are used for dispatching methods and speed up code, but not for type-checking. The result is that many Julia programs are competitive with equivalent programs written in C. This talk gives a brief overview of the key points of Julia's design and considers whether similar ideas could be adopted in R.
Noam Zeilberger Inria Ecole Polytechnique http://noamz.org/
13 July, 2016 11:45AM WVH 366
A "type refinement system" is a type system built on top of a typed programming language, as an extra layer of typing. Over the past few years Paul-André Melliès and I have investigated a categorical foundation for type refinement systems, which is based on the idea of looking at a type refinement system "backwards", in terms of the functor which erases the extra layer of types. The talk will give an introduction to this framework as well as to some of the insights that it offers, such as:
* The idea of viewing Hoare logic as a type refinement system
* The importance of the bifibrational operations of "pushing forward" and "pulling back" (which generalize strongest postconditions and weakest preconditions)
* How those operations can be combined with a monoidal closed structure, to model type refinement systems built over pure lambda calculus
I will not assume any prior background in category theory, although as background reading audience members may be interested in the lecture notes for my recent course at OPLSS (http://noamz.org/oplss16/refinements-notes.pdf, especially Ch.3).
BioSince receiving his PhD from Carnegie Mellon in 2009, Noam Zeilberger has been actively pursuing a career as an itinerant postdoc, with gigs in Paris (Laboratoire PPS), Madrid (IMDEA Software), Princeton (IAS), and back in Paris (MSR-Inria). He is currently a member of Inria Team Parsifal at Ecole Polytechnique. In his free time, he enjoys enumerating lambda terms, and his favorite combinators are B, C and I.
James Mickens Harvard University http://mickens.seas.harvard.edu/
5 July, 2016 1:30PM WVH 366
BioJames Mickens is an IEEE Knight of the Republic, an ACM Templar for Non-Open Access, and a Royal Proceeding of Her Majesty’s Royal Proceedings. His appreciation for syntactically correct code has led him to be called “a semicolon in human form.” His online shopping habits have too many dimensions to be k-means clustered, so he is only shown ads about dinosaurs and ancient siege machines. This does not bother James Mickens, and explains why he spends his summers attacking France with triceratops horns.
Gabriel Scherer Northeastern University http://gallium.inria.fr/~scherer/
18 May, 2016 11:45AM WVH 366
AbstractThis talk reports on some cool ideas I learned during a week-long seminar in Dagstuhl last month; it will present other people's work, not my own. It is aimed at an audience interested in programming language design in general, but not familiar with the theoretical treatment of pure languages and side-effects. We shall start with *demos* first, explaining short code examples in three programming languages: ML with exceptions as a warmup, then the new language 'Eff' of Matija Pretnar and Andrej Bauer, that first implemented so-called effect handlers, and finally the language 'Frank' of Conor McBride, that integrates these handlers in a more uniform style of "effectful call-by-value programming". Only second will we discuss some *theory*, in an accessible way: monads and algebraic effects, which are two distinct ways to formalize side-effects, and the difference between "direct" and "indirect" style of effectful programming. Underlying this talk are two larger, important questions of programming language design, that will be touched during the talk and we can discuss further afterwards: - Do programming language need a facility for user-defined side-effects? - When should we encode new design ideas as libraries/macros in an expressive language, and when should we design languages afresh for them?
BioGabriel is interested in theoretical aspects of type systems, programming language implementation, general programming language concepts, and even some syntactic aspects. He has a preference for the formalizable aspects, or formalizable approaches to programming language aspects, rather than the often subjective appeal to taste or intuition.
Jay McCarthy U. Massachusetts, Lowell https://jeapostrophe.github.io/home/
17 May, 2016 1:30PM WVH 366
AbstractWe present a Coq library that lifts an abstract yet precise notion of running-time into the type of a function. Our library is based on a monad that counts abstract steps, controlled by one of the monadic operations. The monad's computational content, however, is simply that of the identity monad so programs written in our monad (that recur on the natural structure of their arguments) extract into idiomatic OCaml code. We evaluated the expressiveness of the library by proving that red-black tree insertion and search, merge sort, insertion sort, Fibonacci, iterated list insertion, BigNum addition, and Okasaki's Braun Tree algorithms all have their expected running times.
BioJay McCarthy is an associate professor at UMass Lowell in the Computer Science Department. He is a member of the PLT research group and works on the Racket programming language. He is passionate about computer science education & diversity, formal verification, programming language expressiveness, and his wonderful family.
Charles Consel Bordeaux Institute of Technology http://phoenix.inria.fr/charles-consel
2 May, 2016 11:00AM WVH 366
AbstractThe domain of Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly expanding beyond research and becoming a major industrial market with such stakeholders as major manufacturers of chips and connected objects, and fast-growing operators of low-power wide-area networks. Importantly, this emerging domain is driven by applications that leverage the infrastructure to provide users with innovative, high-value services. Because of this application-centric approach, software development plays a key role to realize the full potential of IoT. In this talk, we argue that there is a continuum between orchestrating connected objects in the small and in the large, fostering a unified approach to application development. We examine the requirements for orchestrating connected objects and address them with domain-specific design concepts. We then show how to map these design concepts into dedicated programming patterns and runtime mechanisms. Our work revolves around domain-specific notations integrated into a tool-based design methodology, dedicated to develop IoT applications. We have applied our work across a spectrum of infrastructure sizes; we present examples, ranging from an automated pilot in avionics, to an assisted living platform for the home of seniors, to a parking management system in a smart city.
BioCharles Consel is a professor of Computer Science at Bordeaux Institute of Technology. He served on the faculty of Yale University, Oregon Graduate Institute and the University of Rennes. His research contributions cover programming languages, software engineering, operating systems, pervasive computing, and assistive computing. He leads the Phoenix group at Inria that conducts multi-disciplinary research to design, develop, deploy and assess assistive computing support. This research combines (1) Cognitive Science to study user needs and make a rigorous assessment of assistive services; (2) Sensing and actuating expertise to support the user, based on accurate and rich interactions with the environment; (3) Computer Science to support and guide the development process of the assistive services.
Alex Aiken Stanford University https://theory.stanford.edu/~aiken/
15 April, 2016 11:00AM WVH 366
AbstractThe optimization component of a compiler takes a program as input and produces another, hopefully faster, program as output. At a high level, optimizers solve a search problem over a space of programs, but the traditional architecture of a compiler's optimizer does no search at all. This talk will present the STOKE project, which is exploring the use of Monte Carlo search methods as the basis of a modern compiler optimizer. We will show that search-based program optimization can consistently improve, sometimes substantially, on current production compilers at their highest levels of optimization and can even compete with expert, hand-written assembly. We will also discuss the unique and challenging verification problems that arise when a compiler produces code using a random process.
BioAlex Aiken is the Alcatel-Lucent Professor and the current Tencent Chair of the Computer Science Department at Stanford. Alex received his Bachelors degree in Computer Science and Music from Bowling Green State University in 1983 and his Ph.D. from Cornell University in 1988. Alex was a Research Staff Member at the IBM Almaden Research Center (1988-1993) and a Professor in the EECS department at UC Berkeley (1993-2003) before joining the Stanford faculty in 2003. His research interest is in areas related to programming languages. He is an ACM Fellow, a recipient of Phi Beta Kappa's Teaching Award, and a former National Young Investigator.
Julia Rubin MIT https://people.csail.mit.edu/mjulia/
5 April, 2016 10:30AM WVH 366
AbstractAs software becomes increasingly more complex and yet more pervasive, poor understanding of software behavior compromises the quality and the integrity of software systems that we use. In this talk, I will show that automated analysis techniques can help to identify and reason about software behavior characteristics that matter to humans. After a brief overview of my current research directions, I will focus on techniques for identifying privacy violations in mobile applications, i.e., leakages of sensitive information such as user location and shopping preferences. I will present a set of solutions that rely on contextual, functional and usage-based clues for improving the accuracy of leakage detection and for distinguishing between “legitimate” and “illegitimate” information distribution patterns.
BioJulia Rubin is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the EECS department at MIT. Prior to that, she was a Research Staff Member and, part of the time, a manager at IBM Research in Haifa, Israel. She received her PhD in Computer Science from the University of Toronto, Canada in 2014. Julia’s research interests are in software engineering, program analysis and software security, focusing on improving the quality and the integrity of modern software systems. Her recent work in this area won an ACM Distinguished Paper Award at ASE, two Best Paper Awards, at SPLC and CSMR, and was nominated for Facebook’s Internet Defense Prize at the USENIX Security Symposium.
Dominique Devriese Katholieke Universiteit Leuven https://distrinet.cs.kuleuven.be/people/dominiqu
25 February, 2016 1:30PM WVH 366
BioDominique is a postdoctoral researcher in the research group DistriNet, part of the Computer Science department of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. He holds a postdoctoral research fellowship of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO). He works on formalising properties of object-oriented and object-capability programming languages---specifically a property called effect parametricity--is the author of the grammar-combinators Haskell parsing library, and has added instance arguments to the programming language/proof assistant Agda. He is interested in information flow security, secure compilation,full abstraction, and functional and dependently typed programming languages.
Satish Chandra Samsung https://sites.google.com/site/schandraacmorg/
22 February, 2016 11:00AM WVH 366
BioSatish Chandra obtained a PhD from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1997, and a B.Tech from the Indian Institute of Technology-Kanpur in 1991, both in computer science. From 1997 to 2002, he was a member of technical staff at Bell Laboratories, where his research focused on program analysis, domain-specific languages, and data-communication protocols. From 2002 to 2013, he was a research staff member at IBM Research, where his research focused on bug finding and verification, software synthesis, and test automation. He joined Samsung Electronics in 2013, where he leads the advanced programming tools research team. He is an ACM Distinguished Scientist.
Sukyoung Ryu Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology http://plrg.kaist.ac.kr/ryu
19 February, 2016 11:45AM WVH 366
Ori Lahav Max Planck Institute for Software Systems https://www.mpi-sws.org/~orilahav/
27 January, 2016 11:45AM WVH 366
Multiprocessors and concurrent programming are now pervasive. Typically, they do not guarantee sequential consistency (a.k.a. interleaving semantics), which is the standard assumption by most work on semantics and verification. Instead, they employ subtle memory models, exposing unexpected relaxed behaviors arising from hardware and compiler optimizations.
In this talk, I will focus on one such model --- the release-acquire fragment of the C/C++11 memory model. I will describe its merits, and show how it can be further improved, without additional implementation costs, to: (i) forbid dubious behaviors that are not observed in any implementation; (ii) support fence instructions that restore sequential consistency; and (iii) admit an equivalent intuitive operational semantics.
The talk is based on a joint work with Nick Giannarakis and Viktor Vafeiadis, to be presented in POPL'16.
BioOri Lahav is a postdoctoral researcher at MPI-SWS. He obtained his PhD from Tel Aviv University in the area of non-classical logics. His current research interests are in programming languages generally, with specific focus on memory models, concurrency, verification, and logic.
Marco Patrignani Max Planck Institute for Software Systems http://www.mpi-sws.org/~marcopat/
25 January, 2016 11:00AM WVH 366
AbstractThis talk will informally describe protected module architectures (PMA), a security architecture that provides an assembly-level memory isolation mechanism. Then it will describe how to devise a secure (fully-abstract) compiler for an object-oriented language to PMA. Finally, it will present how to prove the said compiler to be secure and discuss open, related research trajectories.
BioMarco Patrignani did his bachelor and masters study in Bologna, then he obtained a Ph.D. in computer science from the KU Leuven, Belgium. There, with his advisors Dave Clarke and Frank Piessens, he studied secure (fully-abstract) compilation for Intel-SGX like architectures, i.e., untyped assembly languages extended with a memory isolation mechanism. Additionally, he investigated trace-based characterisation of the behaviour of those architectures. He is now a post-doc at MPI-SWS, Germany working on more secure-compilation-related topics with Deepak Garg.
Viktor Vafeiadis Max Planck Institute for Software Systems http://www.mpi-sws.org/~viktor/
14 January, 2016 1:30PM WVH 366
Weak memory models formalize the inconsistent behaviors that one can observe in multithreaded programs running on modern hardware. In so doing, they complicate the already-difficult task of reasoning about correctness of concurrent code. Worse, they render impotent most formal methods that have been developed to tame concurrency, which almost universally assume a strong (i.e., sequentially consistent) memory model. In response, we have developed a number of alternative reasoning techniques that are sound for programs running weak memory consistency. I will cover both program logics, such as relaxed separation logic, as well as theorems that allow reducing reasoning about well-structured weakly consistent implementations down to sequential consistency, and show how these can be applied to reason about a practical RCU implementation.
BioViktor Vafeiadis is a tenure-track researcher at MPI-SWS. He received his BA (2004) and PhD (2008) from the University of Cambridge. Before joining MPI-SWS in October 2010, he was a postdoc at Microsoft Research and at the University of Cambridge. He is interested in programming languages and verification with a focus program logics for weak memory, program logics for concurrency, compiler verifications, automated verification of concurrent programs, and interactive theorem proving.
Santosh Nagarakatte Rutgers University http://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~santosh.nagarakatte/
13 January, 2016 12:00PM WVH 366
Compilers form an integral component of the software development ecosystem. Compiler writers must understand the specification of source and target languages to design sophisticated algorithms that transform programs while preserving semantics. Unfortunately, compiler bugs in mainstream compilers are common. Compiler bugs can manifest as crashes during compilation, or, much worse, result in the silent generation of incorrect programs. Such mis-compilations can introduce subtle errors that are difficult to diagnose and generally puzzling to software developers.
The talk will describe the problems in developing peephole optimizations that perform local rewriting to improve the efficiency of LLVM code. These optimizations are individually difficult to get right, particularly in the presence of undefined behavior; taken together they represent a persistent source of bugs. The talk will present Alive, a domain-specific language for writing optimizations and for automatically either proving them correct or else generating counterexamples. A transformation in Alive is shown to be correct automatically by encoding the transformation into constraints, which are automatically checked for validity using a Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solver. Furthermore, Alive can be automatically translated into C++ code that is suitable for inclusion in an LLVM optimization pass.
Alive is based on an attempt to balance usability and formal methods; for example, it captures—but largely hides—the detailed semantics of three different kinds of undefined behavior in LLVM. We have translated more than 300 LLVM optimizations into Alive and, in the process, found that eight of them were wrong. I will conclude the talk highlighting the lessons learned and the challenges in incorporating lightweight formal methods in the tool-chain of the compiler developer.
BioSantosh Nagarakatte is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Rutgers University. He obtained his PhD from the University of Pennsylvania. His research interests are in Hardware-Software Interfaces spanning Programming Languages, Compilers, Software Engineering, and Computer Architecture. His papers have been selected as IEEE MICRO TOP Picks papers of computer architecture conferences in 2010 and 2013. He has received the NSF CAREER Award in 2015, PLDI 2015 Distinguished Paper Award, and the Google Faculty Research Award in 2014 for his research on incorporating lightweight formal methods for LLVM compiler verification.
Leif Andersen Northeastern University http://leifandersen.net
2 December, 2015 12:00PM WVH 366
Programmers use profilers to understand the performance characteristics of their programs and to focus on those pieces whose improvement may yield the largest gains. A conventional profiler measures the time that a program spends in functions, methods, expressions, and statements. Racket's novel feature-specific profiler supplements this information with timings of instances of linguistic features. This paper reports the results of a successful reproducibility effort to adapt feature-specific profiling to the R programming language. Specifically, the paper demonstrates how easy and effective it is to add the necessary language support, that the approach usefully enhances the information produced by a classical profiler, and that the additional overhead is tolerable.
BioLeif Andersen is a second year Ph.D. student at Northeastern University, studying programming language with Matthias Felleisen.
Emery Berger U. Massachusetts, Amherst http://emeryberger.com/
20 November, 2015 10:30AM WVH 366
Performance clearly matters to users. The most common software update on the AppStore *by far* is "Bug fixes and performance enhancements." Now that Moore's Law Free Lunch has ended, programmers have to work hard to get high performance for their applications. But why is performance so hard to deliver?
I will first explain why our current approaches to evaluating and optimizing performance don't work, especially on modern hardware and for modern applications. I will then present two systems that address these challenges. Stabilizer is a tool that enables statistically sound performance evaluation, making it possible to understand the impact of optimizations and conclude things like the fact that the -O2 and -O3 optimization levels are indistinguishable from noise (unfortunately true).
Since compiler optimizations have largely run out of steam, we need better profiling support, especially for modern concurrent, multi-threaded applications. Coz is a novel "causal profiler" that lets programmers optimize for throughput or latency, and which pinpoints and accurately predicts the impact of optimizations. Coz's approach unlocks numerous previously unknown optimization opportunities. Guided by Coz, we improved the performance of Memcached by 9%, SQLite by 25%, and accelerated six Parsec applications by as much as 68%; in most cases, these optimizations involved modifying under 10 lines of code.
This talk is based on work with Charlie Curtsinger published at ASPLOS 2013 (Stabilizer) and SOSP 2015 (Coz), where it received a Best Paper Award.
Emery Berger is a Professor in the College of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, the flagship campus of the UMass system. He graduated with a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Texas at Austin in 2002. Professor Berger has been a Visiting Scientist at Microsoft Research (7 times) and at the Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC) / Barcelona Supercomputing Center (BSC).
Professor Berger’s research spans programming languages, runtime systems, and operating systems, with a particular focus on systems that transparently improve reliability, security, and performance. He is the creator of a number of influential software systems including Hoard, a fast and scalable memory manager that accelerates multithreaded applications (used by companies including British Telecom, Cisco, Crédit Suisse, Reuters, Royal Bank of Canada, SAP, and Tata, and on which the Mac OS X memory manager is based); DieHard, an error-avoiding memory manager that directly influenced the design of the Windows 7 Fault-Tolerant Heap; and DieHarder, a secure memory manager that was an inspiration for hardening changes made to the Windows 8 heap.
His honors include a Microsoft Research Fellowship, an NSF CAREER Award, a Lilly Teaching Fellowship, a Most Influential Paper Award at OOPSLA 2012, a Google Research Award, a Microsoft SEIF Award, a Best Artifact Award at PLDI, and Best Paper Awards at FAST, OOPSLA, and SOSP; he was named an ACM Senior Member in 2010. Professor Berger is currently a Member of the SIGPLAN Executive Committee and an Associate Editor of the ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, and will serve as Program Chair for PLDI 2016.
Arjun Guha U. Massachusetts, Amherst https://people.cs.umass.edu/~arjun/home/
16 November, 2015 1:00PM WVH 366
Computer networks do not simply connect machines together, but run several applications on network devices, such as load balancers, intrusion detection systems, authentication portals, and more. Historically, these applications were black-boxes running on proprietary hardware, but software-defined networking (SDN) now allows anyone to write their own programs using open networking protocols (e.g., OpenFlow). So, what are the right abstractions for programming networks? This talk will try to address this question in three ways.
First, we present a syntactic theory of network forwarding called NetKAT, which supports equational reasoning about network-wide behavior. Using NetKAT, programmers can ask and answer questions like, "Can A communicate with B?", "Does all traffic traverse my intrusion detection system?", "Is there a loop in my network?", and so on.
Second, we present a fast and efficient compiler for NetKAT. Although several network compilers already exist, they are unusable on even moderately sized networks. Using new data structures and compilation algorithms, our new compiler is two orders of magnitudes faster than prior work and scales to large datacenter networks.
Finally, we consider the problem of building a reliable runtime system for NetKAT. NetKAT abstracts away several low-level details of networking hardware. Although this is a boon for the network programmer, the burden now shifts to us to engineer abstractions correctly. We present a Coq-certified runtime system that is proven correct with respect to a detailed operational model software- defined networks.
BioArjun Guha is an assistant professor of Computer Science at UMass Amherst. He enjoys tackling problems in systems using the tools and principles of programming languages. Apart from network programming, he has worked on Web security and system configuration languages. He received a PhD in Computer Science from Brown University in 2012 and a BA in Computer Science from Grinnell College in 2006.
Suresh Jagannathan Purdue University https://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/suresh/
13 November, 2015 10:30AM WVH 366
In geo-replicated distributed data stores, the need to ensure responsiveness in the face of network partitions and processor failures results in implementations that provide only weak (so-called eventually consistent) guarantees on when data updated by one process becomes visible to another. Applications must be carefully constructed to be aware of unwanted inconsistencies permitted by such implementations (e.g., having negative balances in a bank account, or having an item appear in a shopping cart after it has been removed), but must balance correctness concerns with performance and scalability needs. Because understanding these tradeoffs requires subtle reasoning and detailed knowledge about the underlying data store, implementing robust distributed applications in such environments is often an error-prone and expensive task.
To overcome these issues, this talk presents a declarative programming model for eventually consistent data stores called Quelea. The model comprises a contract language, capable of defining fine-grained application-level consistency properties for replicated data types (and transactions over objects of these types), and a contract enforcement system to analyze contracts and automatically generate the appropriate consistency protocol for the method protected by the contract. By doing so, Quelea enables programmers to reason compositionally about consistency from the perspective of high-level application requirements, not low-level implementation features.
This is joint work with Gowtham Kaki and K.C. Sivaramakrishnan.
Suresh Jagannathan is a Professor of Computer Science at Purdue University where he has been on leave since September 2013, serving as a program manager in the Information Innovation Office at DARPA. He has also been a visiting faculty at Cambridge University, where he spent a sabbatical year in 2010; and, prior to joining Purdue, was a senior research scientist at the NEC Research Institute in Princeton, N.J. He received his Ph.D from MIT.
His research interests are in programming languages generally, with specific focus on compilers, functional programming, program verification, and concurrent and distributed systems. At DARPA, he manages programs on probabilistic programming and machine learning (PPAML), program synthesis and repair leveraging predictive analytics over large software corpora (MUSE), and self-adaptive software through resource-aware analyses, runtimes, and architectures (BRASS).
Manuel Serrano INRIA http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Manuel.Serrano/
3 November, 2015 10:30AM WVH 366
BioManuel is a researcher at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, he used to work on Scheme.
Christoph Kirsch University of Salzburg http://cs.uni-salzburg.at/~ck/
2 November, 2015 11:00AM WVH 366
AbstractThis talk is about scalloc, a fast, multicore-scalable, low-fragmentation memory allocator and selfie, a 4000-line implementation of a tiny self-compiling C compiler and a tiny self-executing MIPS emulator for teaching systems engineering. Scalloc is a typical example of a very complex, multi-year research effort while selfie is, at least for now, a purely educational, many-year effort in teaching compiler, operating system, and virtual machine design based on a single, highly principled software platform. So far scalloc and selfie only share the passion of their authors and are otherwise two distinct projects. Yet earlier versions of selfie, before they were even identified as such, were instrumental in bringing up the generation of students who did scalloc. The main ideas behind scalloc are: uniform treatment of small and big objects through so-called virtual spans, efficiently and effectively reclaiming free memory through fast and scalable global data structures, and constant-time (modulo synchronization) allocation and deallocation operations that trade off memory reuse and spatial locality without being subject to false sharing. The main ideas behind selfie are: a compiler written in and for a tiny subset of C called C* which uses the dereferencing * operator of C for memory access but lacks data structures and many other features and a MIPS emulator written in C* that can execute itself. Both are combined and extended by students to do very cool stuff.
BioChristoph Kirsch is Professor at the University of Salzburg, Austria. From 1999 to 2004 he worked as Postdoctoral Researcher at UC, Berkeley. He later returned to Berkeley as Visiting Scholar (2008-2013) and Visiting Professor (2014) as part of a collaborative research effort in Cyber-Physical Systems. His most recent research interests are in concurrent data structures, memory management, and so-called spatial programming. Dr. Kirsch co-invented embedded programming languages and systems such as Giotto, HTL, and the Embedded Machine, and more recently co-designed high-performance, multicore-scalable concurrent data structures and memory management systems. He co-founded the International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT) and served as ACM SIGBED chair from 2011 until 2013 and ACM TODAES associate editor from 2011 until 2014.
Tony Garnock-Jones Northeastern University http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/tonyg/
28 October, 2015 12:00PM WVH 366
AbstractMost programs interact with the world: via graphical user interfaces, networks, etc. This form of interactivity entails concurrency, and concurrent program components must coordinate their computations. This talk will present Syndicate, a design for a coordinated, concurrent programming language. Each concurrent component in Syndicate is a functional actor that participates in scoped conversations. The medium of conversation arranges for message exchanges and coordinates access to common knowledge. As such, Syndicate occupies a point in design space halfway between actors and threads.
BioTony is a graduate student working with Matthias.
Mathias Payer Purdue University https://nebelwelt.net
23 October, 2015 1:30PM WVH 366
AbstractMemory corruption plagues systems since the dawn of computing. With the rise of defense techniques like stack cookies, ASLR, and DEP, attacks have become much more complicated, yet control-flow hijack attacks are still prevalent. Attacks leverage code reuse attacks, often using some form of information disclosure. Stronger defense mechanisms have been proposed but none have seen wide deployment so far (i) due to the time it takes to deploy a security mechanism, (ii) incompatibility with specific features, and (iii) most severely due to performance overhead. In the talk, we evaluate the security benefits and limitations of the status quo and look into upcoming defense mechanisms (and their attacks). Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) and Code-Pointer Integrity (CPI) are two of the hottest upcoming defense mechanisms. CFI guarantees that the runtime control flow follows the statically determined control-flow graph. An attacker may reuse any of the valid transitions at any control flow transfer. CPI on the other hand is a dynamic property that enforces memory safety guarantees like bounds checks for code pointers by separating code pointers from regular data. We will discuss differences and advantages/disadvantages of both approaches, especially the security benefits they give under novel attacks like Counterfeit Object-Oriented Programming (COOP) and Control-Flow Bending (CFB). COOP reuses complete functions as gadgets and CFB bends the control flow along valid but unintended paths in the control-flow graph of a program.
BioMathias Payer is a security researcher and an assistant professor in computer science at Purdue university. His interests are related to system security, binary exploitation, user-space software-based fault isolation, binary translation/recompilation, and (application) virtualization. His research focuses on protecting applications even in the presence of vulnerabilities, with a focus on memory corruption. Before joining Purdue in 2014 he spent two years as PostDoc in Dawn Song's BitBlaze group at UC Berkeley. He graduated from ETH Zurich with a Dr. sc. ETH in 2012.
Jan Vitek Northeastern University http://janvitek.org
2 October, 2015 12:00PM WVH 366
AbstractI will provide an update on the status of the Reactor project which aims to use LLVM as just-in-time compiler for the R language. I will discuss early challenges such as integration in the environment and garbage collection support.
BioJan Vitek is a Professor at Northeastern, he works on programming language design and implementation.
Kevin Ushey RStudio https://kevinushey.github.io/
2 October, 2015 11:00AM WVH 366
AbstractKevin will discuss the details behind the implementation of completions + diagnostics, as well as some future goals re: enabling user extensibility of both the autocompletion and diagnostics systems.
BioKevin is a software engineer at RStudio. He graduated from the University of British Columbia with an MSc in Statistics, with a thesis focusing on the use of non-linear mixed effects models in the analysis of yeast growth curves in gene knockout studies. Shortly thereafter, he worked doing data analysis at St. Paul's hospital in Vancouver as part of the Daley lab, and later at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle as part of the Gottardo lab. At RStudio, Kevin primarily works on the RStudio IDE, but also maintains the R package packrat.
Luke Tierney University of Iowa http://homepage.stat.uiowa.edu/~luke/
2 October, 2015 10:00AM WVH 366
AbstractR is a dynamic language for statistical computing and graphics. In recent years R has become a major framework for both statistical practice and research. This talk present a very brief outline of the R language and its evolution and describe some current efforts on improvements to the core computational engine, including work on compilation of R code, efforts to take advantage of multiple processor cores, and modifications to support working with larger data sets.
BioLuke Tierney is a Professor Statistics at the University of Iowa and one of the key contributors to the R project.
Alex Summers ETH Zürich http://people.inf.ethz.ch/summersa/wiki/
26 June, 2015 1:45PM WVH 366
AbstractModern verification techniques are becoming ever-more powerful and sophisticated, and building tools to implement them is a time-consuming and difficult task. Writing a new verifier to validate each on-paper approach is impractical; for this reason intermediate verification languages such as Boogie and Why3 have become popular over the last decade. However, verification approaches geared around complex program logics (such as separation logic) have typically been implemented in specialised tools, since the reasoning is hard to map down to first-order automated reasoning. In practice, this means that a rich variety of modern techniques have no corresponding tool support. In this talk, I will present the new Silver intermediate verification language, which has been designed to facilitate the lightweight implementation of a variety of modern methodologies for program verification. In contrast to lower-level verification languages, Silver provides native support for heap reasoning; modes of reasoning such as concurrent separation logic, dynamic frames and rely-guarantee/invariants can be simply encoded. Silver has been developed as part of the Viper project, which provides two automated back-end verifiers for Silver programs. Since releasing our software in September last year, it has been used for (internal and external) projects to build tools for Java verification, non-blocking concurrency reasoning, flow-sensitive typing and reasoning about GPU and Linux kernel code.
BioAlex Summers obtained his PhD from Imperial College London in 2009, in the area of type systems and classical logics. Since then he has worked in a variety of areas concerning software correctness and verification, at Imperial College London and ETH Zurich. His research interests include developing specification techniques for different (usually concurrent) programming paradigms, and implementing these in automatic verification tools. He was recently awarded the 2015 AITO Dahl-Nygaard Junior Prize for his work on type systems and the verification of object-oriented programs.
Roopsha Samanta IST Austria http://pub.ist.ac.at/~rsamanta/
26 June, 2015 1:30PM WVH 366
AbstractIn this talk, I will first present a method and a tool TARA for generating succinct representations of sets of concurrent traces. In our work, we focus on trace sets that contain all correct or all incorrect permutations of events from a given trace. We represent such trace sets as Boolean combinations of happens-before ordering constraints between events. Our trace set representations can drive diverse verification, fault localization, repair, and synthesis techniques for concurrent programs. In the remainder of the talk, I will focus on the use of our representation for synchronization synthesis. This work appears in POPL 2015 and CAV 2015, and is joint work with Pavol Cerny, Ed Clarke, Ashutosh Gupta, Tom Henzinger, Arjun Radhakrishna, Leonid Ryzhyk and Thorsten Tarrach.
Programming Language Seminar, Junior
The PL Seminar, Jr. is a seminar where students new to the area can discuss the study of programming languages. This seminar is not intended to replace the main PL Seminar, but we hope that it can augment that by providing a place where junior students can discuss topics and ask questions at a pace better suited to our level of knowledge. Topics include:
- Design and analysis of programming languages: syntax, semantics, pragmatics (ie, how do you use a language feature in real programs?)
- Implementation of programming languages
- Program development, both large and small
- Programming pedagogy
- Programming tools and environments
- and anything else that catches our interest.
Why PL Seminar, Jr.?
In many ways, the existing PL Seminar doesn't serve junior students well. For us, it is intended to provide an environment where we can go to listen to current research. While nobody expects us to understand the entire presentation, we would ideally be able to say, "I didn't understand that, but it sounded really neat." By and large, that hasn't happened, for a number of reasons:
- For many of us, once our level of comprehension drops below a certain threshold, we tend to get frustrated and tune out. It's very difficult to say that something sounds interesting when you don't even feel like you understand the language.
- The discussion environment isn't really helpful to junior students. The questions from the audience are typically research-oriented; often, a great deal of background knowledge is required to follow the ensuing discussions.
- To overuse a metaphor, the bandwidth available for discussion tends to be filled by a relatively small number of people; it's often difficult for a junior student to get a word in edgewise.
For this seminar to be as useful as possible, it is important we establish the right "seminar culture." This is, of course, something that is hard to describe, and it will shift and evolve. However, there are some guidelines for what we are trying to accomplish:
- Attendees are willing to learn and to help others learn. They should not come in order to demonstrate how much smarter they are than everyone else just because they know so much more about a specific topic.
- Active listening is encouraged. Ask questions! In particular, while research questions are of course welcome, basic comprehension questions are especially encouraged. If you don't understand something, or if you don't believe a step in a proof, ask!
- An important corollary: no question is too stupid to ask. This places an obligation on other members of the seminar: rather than express frustration at the basic nature of a question, look at it as an opportunity to practice your skills in explaining things.
- Of course, while active listening is a good thing, we want to avoid having a few people fill the communications channel. So, please be considerate of the other people present and allow them to join the discussions as well.
Any attendee may propose a topic; we'll solicit volunteers to present a survey of the area. We expect that most of the presenters will be junior PL students, although outside presentations are welcome.